Legal Opinion

Pearson v. County of Tift

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided September 5, 1963No. 22112PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Duckworth, Chief Justice.

1. Since, under Mayor &c. of Savannah v. Collins, 211 Ga. 191 (84 SE2d 454), the county could either condemn property or use property it owns for governmental purposes, even though such use violates a zoning ordinance of a municipality in said county, we do not stop to pass upon the validity of the zoning ordinance or the zoning map which was not attached thereto, since, if they are valid, they would not constitute a valid reason for enjoining the county from using its property for governmental purposes.

2. The county commissioners had authority under Ga. L. 1917, p.…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Mayor &C. of Savannah v. CollinsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1954

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Evans v. Just Open GovernmentSupreme Court of Georgia · 1979
  2. BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS OF CHATHAM COUNTY v. Chatham AdvertisersSupreme Court of Georgia · 1988
  3. Concerned Citizens of Douglas County v. Douglas CountySupreme Court of Georgia · 1986
  4. County of Tompkins v. PowersNew York Supreme Court · 1964
  5. Evans v. Just Open GovernmentSupreme Court of Georgia · 1979

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API