Legal Opinion

Jefferson County Bank v. Hale

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided September 6, 1925PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Cook

The complainants, creditors of W. T. and Cornelia B. Hale, filed their hills under section 6097, Shannon’s Code, attacking as fraudulent the conveyance May 1, 1924, by Mr. and Mrs. Hale to their sons, Julius and Eichard Hale, and seeking to subject the land covered by the deed to payment of debts.

The note of W. T. and Cornelia Hale for $1,735 was executed to the Jefferson County Bank April 26, 1924, and the bank filed a bill to enforce payment of the note' with interest and attorney’s fees. The First National Bank of Morristown seeks to enforce payment of two judgments recovered before a…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Figuers v. FlyTennessee Supreme Court · 1916
  2. Travis v. SitzTennessee Supreme Court · 1915
  3. Templeton v. BrownTennessee Supreme Court · 1887
  4. Ferguson v. BoothTennessee Supreme Court · 1913
  5. Carpenter v. FranklinTennessee Supreme Court · 1890

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. McOuatt v. McOuattMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1946
  2. Union Planters National Bank, of the Estate of Forrest C. Ladd v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1966
  3. Great American Indemnity Co. v. Utility Contractors, Inc.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 1937
  4. Newton Finance Corp. v. ConnerTennessee Supreme Court · 1930
  5. In Re AkinsTennessee Supreme Court · 2002

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API