Legal Opinion

Tallman v. Hanssen

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided August 17, 1988No. 87-182PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HARRIS, Justice.

The trial court dismissed this suit which arose from a dispute over a workers’ compensation claim. We affirm in part, reverse in part, and remand for further proceedings.

Plaintiff Tallman says he suffered a job-related injury and was entitled to workers’ compensation benefits. Defendant Wau-sau Insurance Company, the employer’s insurer, refused to pay medical bills which Tallman says resulted from the injury.

Tallman filed a claim with the industrial commissioner. In the disputed proceeding which followed defendant Dennis Hanssen, an attorney, represented Wausau. The workers’…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Coleman v. American Universal Insurance Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1979
  2. Fabricius v. Montgomery Elevator CompanySupreme Court of Iowa · 1963
  3. Southern Farm Bureau Cas. Ins. v. HollandMississippi Supreme Court · 1984
  4. Beeck v. KapalisSupreme Court of Iowa · 1981
  5. Tigges v. City of AmessSupreme Court of Iowa · 1984

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Kiner v. Reliance Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1990
  2. Katz v. Odin, Feldman & Pittleman, P.C.District Court, E.D. Virginia · 2004
  3. Toby Thornton v. American Interstate Insurance CompanySupreme Court of Iowa · 2017
  4. Boylan v. American Motorists Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1992
  5. Hough v. Pacific Ins. Co., Ltd.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1996

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API