Legal Opinion

Mulligan v. State

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided August 16, 1973No. 4202, 4203PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice McINTYRE

Each of the defendants named above was charged in district court with unlawful possession of a controlled substance (marihuana). The two cases were tried together, to the court without a jury. Both defendants were found guilty by the trial judge and given sentences. Both have appealed and their appeals are considered together.

The question we are concerned with is whether there was sufficient evidence for the conviction of defendants. It is apparent from the record that the trial judge had misgivings about his finding of guilt. In announcing his decision he stated the law in his opinion would…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. The PEOPLE v. NettlesIllinois Supreme Court · 1961
  2. State v. HaynesOhio Supreme Court · 1971
  3. Spataro v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1965
  4. William Evans and Josephine Evans v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1958
  5. Brown v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1971

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. Temple v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1978
  2. Blakely v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1975
  3. Jones v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1977
  4. Rodarte Ex Rel. Rodarte v. City of RivertonWyoming Supreme Court · 1976
  5. Martin v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1978

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API