Katz v. Costa Armatori, S.P.A.
District Court, S.D. Florida
1Opinion of the Court
FINAL ORDER OF REMAND
JAMES LAWRENCE KING, Chief Judge.
Plaintiffs’ motion to remand presents a common question, albeit in a limited context: whether a state court’s summary adjudication in favor of a nondiverse defendant entitles the sole remaining diverse defendant to remove the case to federal court. The question ordinarily is answered negatively, unless the nondiverse defen dant was “fraudulently joined.” A precise parameter for this “fraudulent joinder” exception has not conclusively been surveyed, and today the court lends its voice to the debate over this exception’s scope.
The plaintiffs…
2Cases cited49 opinions
- Stewart Organization, Inc. v. Ricoh Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Van Dusen v. BarrackSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Hanna v. PlumerSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Prima Paint Corp. v. Flood & Conklin Mfg. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Gully v. First Nat. Bank in MeridianSupreme Court of the United States · 1936
44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Riverdale Baptist Church v. Certainteed Corp.District Court, D. Maryland · 2004
- Oxendine v. Merck and Co., Inc.District Court, D. Maryland · 2002
- Lane v. Champion International Corp.District Court, S.D. Alabama · 1993
- Miles v. KilgoreDistrict Court, N.D. Alabama · 1996
- Oxendine v. Merck & Co.District Court, D. Maryland · 2002
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.