Legal Opinion

Remco Steamship Co. v. Commissioner

United States Board of Tax Appeals

Decided April 27, 1934No. Docket Nos. 57728, 57729Published

1. Section 240(f) of the Revenue Act of 1926 contemplates the consolidation of all the accounts of several related companies. 2. A corporation received a dividend from a wholly owned subsidiary in a year in which it suffered heavy losses. Held, the amount of such dividend may not be excluded from the income of the recipient in the computation of net loss to be forwarded to a subsequent taxable year.

1Opinion of the Court

REMCO STEAMSHIP COMPANY, PETITIONER, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, RESPONDENT.

CASPAR LUMBER COMPANY, PETITIONER, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, RESPONDENT.

Remco Steamship Co. v. Commissioner

Docket Nos. 57728, 57729.

United States Board of Tax Appeals

30 B.T.A. 579; 1934 BTA LEXIS 1312;

April 27, 1934, Promulgated

1. Section 240(f) of the Revenue Act of 1926 contemplates the consolidation of all the accounts of several related companies.

2. A corporation received a dividend from a wholly owned subsidiary in a year in which it suffered heavy losses. Held, the amount of such dividend may…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Remco Steamship Co. v. CommissionerUnited States Board of Tax Appeals · 1934

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API