Legal Opinion
Schaal v. Callahan
District Court, D. Connecticut
Decided September 29, 1997No. 3:95CV2568 (RNC)PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CHATIGNY, District Judge.
After review and absent objection, the Magistrate Judge’s recommended ruling is hereby approved and adopted.
So Ordered.
RECOMMENDED RULING ON PLAINTIFF’S MOTIONS FOR JUDGMENT ON THE PLEADINGS AND DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR ORDER AFFIRMING THE DECISION OF THE COMMISSIONER
MARTINEZ, United States Magistrate Judge.
The plaintiff, Daniel J. Sehaal, filed this action seeking review, pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 405(g), of the decision of the Secretary denying his claim for disability insurance benefits under the Social Security Act. The defendant moved for an order affirming the…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Richardson v. PeralesSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Bowen v. YuckertSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Shirley Small v. Secretary of Health and Human ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1989
- Elmer G. Berry v. Richard Schweiker, Secretary of Health and Human ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1982
- Johnson v. BowenCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1987
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- White v. Commissioner of Social SecurityDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 2004
- Garcia v. Commissioner of Social SecurityDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2007
- Gavin, Jr. v. Commissioner of Social SecurityDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2020
- Jamison v. Commissioner of Social SecurityDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2022
- Martinez Jr v. Commissioner of Social SecurityDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2019
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.