Legal Opinion

In re Nathan

New York Supreme Court

Decided March 2, 1942PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtEder, J.

This is a motion by petitioner, an attorney and counselor at law, instituted in reliance on section 475 of the Judiciary Law, for an order fixing his attorney’s lien upon the sum of $3,500, the amount of a settlement agreed upon by and between his client, one Laura J. Simpson, and the respondent, the city of New York, in connection with a claim made by said Laura J. Simpson against the city of New York for personal injuries. While the petitioner refers to his client as “ plaintiff ” and to the respondent as “ defendant,” this is a gratuitous designation, for the fact is that no action was…

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. Cox v. ScottAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1960
  2. United States v. Guaranty Trust Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1945
  3. De La Paz v. Coastal Petroleum Transport Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1955

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API