Hemphill v. State

SCHWARTZ, Chief Judge.

This is an appeal from a denial of a Rule 3.850 motion which was disposed of without an evidentiary hearing. We affirm.

The defendant’s primary ground for relief lies in the claim that he was misad-*842vised by his counsel or otherwise did not understand precisely to which of the several charges against him he would plead and which would be abandoned by the state. However, the motion notably fails to allege that he did not agree to the ultimate sentencing consequences of the plea agreement: fifteen years in prison, followed by five years probation. In this posture, we must…