Buffalo Electric Co. v. State
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Per curiam
The Court of Claims Judge dismissed the claim on the ground that the claim was barred as a matter of law by the claimant’s acceptance of a check in payment of the undisputed contract balance, under the provision of the contract that “ The acceptance by the contractor of the last payment on this contract, as hereinbefore provided, shall be and shall operate as a release to the State of New York * * * from all claim and liability # * # relating to or affecting the work ”. In our opinion, the dismissal of the claim as a matter of law was erroneous. There was a question of fact as to whether the…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Rehill v. RehillNew York Court of Appeals · 1953
- Rusciano & Son Corp. v. StateNew York Court of Claims · 1952
- Oakhill Contracting Co. v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1941
- In re the Estate of ClarkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1931
- Wheeler v. StateAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1955
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- In re the Arbitration between Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. & HollerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1976
- Spanos Painting Contractors, Inc. v. Union Building & Construction Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1964
- Spanos Painting Contractors, Inc. v. Union Building & Construction Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1964