Legal Opinion

Buffalo Electric Co. v. State

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided December 23, 1959No. Claim No. 32217PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Per curiam

The Court of Claims Judge dismissed the claim on the ground that the claim was barred as a matter of law by the claimant’s acceptance of a check in payment of the undisputed contract balance, under the provision of the contract that “ The acceptance by the contractor of the last payment on this contract, as hereinbefore provided, shall be and shall operate as a release to the State of New York * * * from all claim and liability # * # relating to or affecting the work ”. In our opinion, the dismissal of the claim as a matter of law was erroneous. There was a question of fact as to whether the…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Rehill v. RehillNew York Court of Appeals · 1953
  2. Rusciano & Son Corp. v. StateNew York Court of Claims · 1952
  3. Oakhill Contracting Co. v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1941
  4. In re the Estate of ClarkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1931
  5. Wheeler v. StateAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1955

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. In re the Arbitration between Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. & HollerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1976
  2. Spanos Painting Contractors, Inc. v. Union Building & Construction Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1964
  3. Spanos Painting Contractors, Inc. v. Union Building & Construction Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1964

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API