Legal Opinion

Darmetko v. Electron Technology

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division

Decided October 2, 1990PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

BAIME, J.A.D.

The sole question presented by this appeal concerns the constitutionality of N.J.S.A. 34:15-36. That statute requires injured workers to be seventy-five percent disabled before factors other than physical or neuropsychiatric impairments are considered in the determination of permanent total disability. Petitioner contends that the statutory restriction runs afoul of due process and equal protection. We disagree and affirm.

Petitioner, a 63 year old factory worker, fell while performing her employment duties, fracturing her right hip. During…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. City of New Orleans v. DukesSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. Corbitt v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  3. Close v. Kordulak Bros.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1965
  4. TAXPAYERS ASSN. OF WEYMOUTH TP. INC. v. Weymouth Tp.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1976
  5. Troy Hills Vil. v. Tp. Council Tp. Parsippany-Troy HillsSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1975

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Perez v. Capitol OrnamentalNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1996
  2. Phillips v. CurialeNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1991
  3. Darmetko v. Electron TechnologySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1991
  4. FLORALBA AVENDANO VS. TARGET CORPORATION (DIVISION OF WORKERS' COMPENSATION)New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API