Legal Opinion
Clark v. Mangham, Hardy, Rolfs & Abadie
Louisiana Court of Appeal
Decided February 24, 1999No. 30,471-CAPublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
|, WILLIAMS, J.
The principal issue in this action is whether the legal malpractice claims of the plaintiffs, Mr. & Mrs. Larry Clark (“Clarks”) and L & M Hair Care, Inc., *44against defendants, Anna Dow (“Dow”) and the law firm of Brook, Morial, Pizza and Van Loon, L.L.P., (“Brook, Morial law firm”) were perempted. The Clarks have also included an assignment of error on appeal from a separate judgment for which the Clarks did not obtain an order of appeal. For the following reasons, the judgment of the trial court is affirmed.
FACTS •'
The Clarks filed legal malpractice claims against Mangum,…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Reeder v. NorthSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1997
- Strickland v. LayrissonLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1997
- Voelkel v. StateLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1995
- Jones, Walker, Waechter, Poitevent, Carrere and Denegre, LLP v. Homestead Ins. Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1997
- Morgan v. Campbell, Campbell & JohnsonLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1995
3Cited by4 opinions
- Bamburg v. St. Francis Medical CenterLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2010
- Osborn Painting, Inc. v. AuxilienLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2005
- Harold Lee v. State of Louisiana, Thru the dept.of Corr.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 2010
- State of Louisiana Department of Transportation & Development v. Larry E. Clark, et ux consolidated with State of Louisiana Department of Transportation & Development v. Larry E. Clark, et ux consolidated with State of Louisiana Department of Transportation & Development v. Larry E. Clark, et ux consolidated with L & M Hair Care Products, Inc. v. State of Louisiana Department of Transportation & DevelopmentLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2020