Legal Opinion

Moyano v. Williams

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division

Decided June 22, 1993PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

FAST, J.S.C.

This opinion is based on the application of the doctrine of res judicata to a subsequent action for the summary dispossession of a tenant by the same landlord. I have found no other opinion holding that this doctrine may be applied to a second summary dispossess action.

FACTS

This case relates to a two-family home in Orange, New Jersey. Plaintiff bought this property at an auction conducted by the City of Orange in December 1987. At that time, defendant had been the sole tenant (since 1976) pursuant to a month-to-month tenancy at a monthly rent of $350 for the entire property,…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Culver v. Insurance Co. of North AmericaSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1989
  2. Pascarella v. BruckNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1983
  3. Charlie Brown of Chatham, Inc. v. BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT FOR TOWNSHIP OF CHATHAMNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1985
  4. Passaic National Bank & Trust Co. v. East Ridgelawn CemeterySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1946
  5. Bloomfield Tp. v. Rosanna'sNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1992

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. FENNER REAL ESTATE, INC, ETC. VS. ELLEN KRAMER (DC-8017-16, ESSEX COUNTY AND STATEWIDE)New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API