Legal Opinion

Hirs v. United States

District Court, S.D. Alabama

Decided July 26, 1965No. Civ. A. Nos. 3236-64, 3237-64PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

DANIEL HOLCOMBE THOMAS, District Judge.

1. These are consolidated suits for refunds of income taxes. They involve the character and treatment to be accorded payments made the plaintiffs in Case 3236-64 by Forlands, Inc., a corporate taxpayer now dissolved. Its trus*911tees in liquidation and the assigneeowner of its assets, sue in Case 3237-64. The corporate case involves the same payments made to Mr. and Mrs. Hirs in the companion suit. The reciprocal tax effects of the payments present a common question. Were certain advances made to Forlands, Inc., by Mr. and Mrs. Hirs, contributions to capital…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Royalty Service Corporation v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Montana · 1959

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Ackerson v. United StatesDistrict Court, W.D. Kentucky · 1967

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API