Legal Opinion

Levitt v. Fichtner

New York Supreme Court

Decided March 30, 1948PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHofstadter, J.

The preliminary objection of the judgment debtor addressed to the timeliness of the service of the order to show cause is overruled. So long as the judgment remains unsatisfied, the pendency of the proceeding to reach the proceeds of another insurance policy is not a defense to the present proceeding. The judgment debtor has submitted no proof tending to show that the proceeds of the policy which the receiver is seeking in this proceeding to have applied to the payment of the judgment are exempt from her debts. It does not appear *612that she effected thg insurance on her late husband’s life…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Levine v. Laurdan Management Corp.City of New York Municipal Court · 1942
  2. Matter of Genesee Valley Trust Co. v. GlazerNew York Court of Appeals · 1946
  3. Levine v. Laurdan Management Corp.Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1943
  4. Levine v. Laurdan Management Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1943

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. In Re RundlettDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1993
  2. In Re RundlettUnited States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · 1992

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API