Legal Opinion

UBANK v. FORENSIC STAT LABORATORY INC., MADHUKAR SHARMA, and GIANCARLO GASPARINI

District Court, S.D. Florida

Decided May 15, 2026No. 1:25-cv-22594Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA Case No. 25-cv-22594-BLOOM/Elfenbein UBANK, Plaintiff, v. FORENSIC STAT LABORATORY INC., MADHUKAR SHARMA, and GIANCARLO GASPARINI, Defendants. ________________________________/ ORDER ON MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT THIS CAUSE is before the Court upon Plaintiff UBank’s (“UBank”) Motion for Summary Judgment Against Defendants as to Counts I, II, III, IV, and VI Only (“Motion”), ECF No. [42]. Defendants have failed to respond to the Motion. The Court has carefully reviewed the Motion, the record, and is otherwise fully advised. For the…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Vega v. T-MOBILE USA, INC.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2009
  2. Jacqueline Lewis v. City of Union City, GeorgiaCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2019
  3. Miccosukee Tribe of Indians of Florida v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2008
  4. St. Joe Corp. v. McIverSupreme Court of Florida · 2004
  5. James P. Crocker v. Deputy Sheriff Steven Eric BeattyCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2018

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API