Commonwealth v. Harry Weiner
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Whitmore, J.,
The defendant appellant was convicted in the court below on an indictment charging him with having received stolen goods, to-wit, a lot of copper wire, knowing the same to have been feloniously stolen, taken and carried away; he was sentenced and the court below made an order that this appeal should' operate as a supersedeas.
The appellant assigns as error (1) the court’s refusal to quash the indictment, (2) that the court erred in refusing to withdraw a juror due to a remark of the district attorney in his opening address to the jury, (3) that the court erred in its…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Commonwealth v. Magid and DicksteinSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1927
- Commonwealth v. BakerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1928
- Commonwealth of Pa. v. AriffSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1929
3Cited by13 opinions
- Commonwealth v. LopinsonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1967
- Commonwealth v. GrossSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1947
- Commonwealth v. BRUNOSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1964
- Commonwealth v. WiswesserSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1936
- Commonwealth v. BozziSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1955
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.