Legal Opinion · Dissent

Texas Prudential Insurance Company v. Dillard

Texas Supreme Court

Decided November 20, 1957No. A-6211Published

1DissentJustice Calvert

I respectfully dissent.

The majority recognize that the judgments of the trial court and the Court of Civil Appeals may be reversed only if the record before us shows, as a matter of law, that the insured was not in “good health” within the meaning of the policy of insurance on April 15, 1953. In answer to the only special issue pertinent to our review the jury found he was in good health on that date. In submitting the issue to the jury the trial court defined “good health” as follows: “The term ‘Good Health,’ as used in this charge, does not mean absolute perfection. It means that a person…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Biggers v. Continental Bus System, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1957
  2. Coxson v. Atlanta Life InsuranceTexas Supreme Court · 1944
  3. Trevino v. American Nat. Ins. Co.Texas Commission of Appeals · 1943
  4. Hines v. Kansas City Life Ins. Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1924
  5. Southern Surety Co. v. BentonTexas Commission of Appeals · 1926

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API