Legal Opinion

Hamel v. Crosietier

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided July 30, 1969No. 5904PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGriffith, J.

This is a tort action to recover damages for personal injuries arising out of a slingshot accident which occurred on April 11, 1965. Trial by jury resulted in defendants’ verdicts.

Plaintiff’s exceptions together with defendant Wellwood Company’s exception to the denial of their motion for nonsuit were reserved and transferred by the Trial Court (Morris, J.).

In March of 1965 defendant Paul Crosietier purchased a small slingshot at the defendant Wellwood Company store. On April 11, 1965 Paul was nine years eleven months old and plaintiff Dana Hamel was six years ten months old. On that date…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Duffy v. CortesiIllinois Supreme Court · 1954
  2. Camardo v. New York State RailwaysNew York Court of Appeals · 1928
  3. Romine v. City of WatsekaAppellate Court of Illinois · 1950
  4. Holbrock v. Hamilton Distributing, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1967

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Dorais v. PaquinSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1973
  2. Corbeil v. RouslinSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1972
  3. Perry Ex Rel. Perry v. FredetteSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1970

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API