Legal Opinion
Monarch Life Insurance Company v. Loyal Protective Life Insurance Company
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided March 23, 1964No. 172, Docket 28412PublishedCited by 49 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
KAUFMAN, Circuit Judge:
Simply stated, the sole issue presented by this appeal is whether a private treble-damage action is available for illegal boycotts in the insurance industry.
In the McCarran Act of 1945,15 U.S.C. §§ 1011-1015, Congress provided that the Sherman and Clayton Acts would be inapplicable to the business of insurance to the extent that the industry was regulated by state law. An exception was written into § 3(b) of the Act, however, to preserve the prohibitions of the Sherman Act, insofar as they related to boycotts and agreements to boycott. The present suit was instituted in…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- United States v. South-Eastern Underwriters Assn.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
- United States v. BryanSupreme Court of the United States · 1950
- Hooper v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
- Cabell v. MarkhamCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1945
- Markham v. CabellSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by49 opinions
- St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance v. BarrySupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- International Telephone and Telegraph Corporation v. General Telephone & Electronics Corporation and Hawaiian Telephone CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1975
- Cia. Petrolera Caribe, Inc. v. Arco Caribbean, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1985
- Hamilton Life Insurance Company of New York v. Republic National Life Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1969
- Curtis Ambulance of Florida, Inc. v. Board of County Commissioners of the County of Shawnee, Kansas, and Medevac Midamerica, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1987
44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.