Legal Opinion

Harrell v. Atlantic Refining Company

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided October 6, 1960No. 3720PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McDONALD, Chief Justice.

This is a suit for declaratory judgment filed by Atlantic Refining Company as plaintiff, against H. M. Harrell and others as defendants, seeking a determination of the common boundary line between oil and gas leases held by plaintiff and defendants. Graves and Taub own the fee to all of the land here involved (as well as surrounding lands) and are the common lessor to both plaintiff and defendants.

It is believed that the schematic diagram of the area involved which follows, will facilitate a better understanding of the situation presented for solution:

In October 1940…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Humble Oil & Refining Co. v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1942
  2. Richey v. MillerTexas Supreme Court · 1944
  3. Zeppa v. Houston Oil Co. of TexasCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1938
  4. Walton v. SteffensCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1942
  5. Haley v. MurrayCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1944

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Arkla, Inc. v. HarrisCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1993
  2. Dewitt and Rearick v. Ferguson, Texas Court of Appeals, 8th District (El Paso)1985
  3. Boring & Tunneling Co. of America, Inc. v. Salazar, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1989

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API