York v. Gaasland Co.
Washington Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtHamley, J.
This is an action to recover compensation for services rendered in obtaining government contracts and locating needed construction materials.
Plaintiff, William York, is an experienced “expediter” who is acquainted with government officials in Washington, D. C. Defendant, Gaasland Company, Inc., is a corporation which was engaged in construction work for the Federal government in Alaska. The suit came to trial on the second amended complaint. This pleading set out five causes of action, only the first, second, and fourth of which are involved on this appeal.
The first cause of action pertains…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- United States v. Trans-Missouri Freight Assn.Supreme Court of the United States · 1897
- Givens v. ZerbstSupreme Court of the United States · 1921
- Home Insurance v. Northern Pacific Railway Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1943
- Hall v. AndersonWashington Supreme Court · 1943
- Goodier v. HamiltonWashington Supreme Court · 1933
3Cited by6 opinions
- State v. ColemanSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1965
- Weatherford Ex Rel. Michael L. v. StateArizona Supreme Court · 2003
- Lamb v. Railway Express Agency, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1958
- Mitchell International Enterprises, Inc. v. DalyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1983
- Ketel v. HovickWashington Supreme Court · 1955
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.