Legal Opinion

Downing v. Bourlier

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided March 15, 1855PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Error to St. Louis Circuit Court. The case is sufficiently stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtRyland, Judge

This action was upon a promissory note. The defendant in his answer says that the promissory note was delivered by the defendant to the plaintiffs in consideration of a sale made and delivery to be made by the plaintiffs to the defendant of a package of merchandise, consisting of certain articles of jewelry, which said package of merchandise, the said plaintiffs, though often requested, have refused and still do refuse to deliver to defendant. The answer also states that on the 5th day of October, 1854, the defendant made his certain promissory note, bearing date on the 10th of October, 1854,…

2Cited by6 opinions

  1. Clark's v. HannibalSupreme Court of Missouri · 1865
  2. Murphy v. BennettCalifornia Supreme Court · 1886
  3. Nichols v. CarterMissouri Court of Appeals · 1892
  4. Gull River Lumber Co. v. School District No. 39North Dakota Supreme Court · 1890
  5. Smith v. HarrisSupreme Court of Missouri · 1869

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API