Legal Opinion

Stolz Family Partnership v. Daum

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided January 12, 2004No. 02-7680Published

1Opinion of the Court

355 F.3d 92

P. STOLZ FAMILY PARTNERSHIP L.P., on behalf of itself and others similarly situated, Plaintiff-Counter-Defendant-Appellant,

v.

Steven B. DAUM, Paula B. Daum, Philip Spies, and Smart World Technologies, LLC, Defendant-Counter-Claimant-Appellee.

Docket No. 02-7680.

United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.

Argued: March 4, 2003.

Decided: January 12, 2004.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York, Rakoff, J. COPYRIGHT MATERIAL OMITTED Paul D. Wexler, Bragar Wexler Eagel & Morgenstern, LLP, New York, NY, for Plaintiff-Counter-Defendant-Appellant.

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited40 opinions

  1. Gustafson v. Alloyd Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1995
  2. Luce v. EdelsteinCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1986
  3. Rosenberg v. Town of North BergenSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1972
  4. Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 95,379 Marian W. Short v. Belleville Shoe Manufacturing CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1990
  5. Halperin v. eBanker USA.COM, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2002

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API