Legal Opinion

Ramstetter v. MacGinnis

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided May 10, 1937No. 13,987PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Bakke

The defendant in error, plaintiff below, was awarded a deficiency judgment of $2,461.50 in a foreclosure action on a chattel mortgage given by plaintiffs in error, defendants below, to secure payment of a note for $5,500 given in payment for thirteen hundred fifty head of sheep which they purchased from him. The parties will be referred to as plaintiff and defendants, respectively, as they appeared in the trial court.

During the summer of 1934 the plaintiff owned the sheep in question. About the first of August he rented a pasture from defendant, Matilda Ramstetter, and ranged the sheep there,…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Bagley v. Lumbermens Mutual Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1936
  2. Bosick v. YoungbloodSupreme Court of Colorado · 1934
  3. Thomas v. BeirneSupreme Court of Colorado · 1934
  4. Dyer v. BengtsonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1922

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Hayden v. PerrySupreme Court of Colorado · 1943
  2. Bowman v. MaySupreme Court of Colorado · 1938
  3. Parsons v. ShacklefordSupreme Court of Colorado · 1948
  4. Richards Engineers, Inc. v. SpanelColorado Court of Appeals · 1987

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API