Legal Opinion
Rode v. Dellarciprete
District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania
Decided November 10, 1986No. Civ. A. 85-0791PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
CALDWELL, District Judge.
Introduction
Plaintiffs, Vivian M. Rode and Jay C. Hileman, commenced this action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. §§ 1983 and 1985 asserting that defendants violated their constitutional rights. 1 More specifically, plaintiff Hileman alleges that defendants, individually and as members of a conspiracy, subjected him to a course of harassment in retaliation for his testimony against the Pennsylvania State Police (“PSP”). Plaintiff Rode claims that she has also been harassed by defendants because she is the sister-in-law of Hileman. Maintaining that there is no genuine…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Mt. Healthy City School District Board of Education v. DoyleSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Connick Ex Rel. Parish of Orleans v. MyersSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Central Hudson Gas & Electric Corp. v. Public Service CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Memphis Light, Gas & Water Division v. CraftSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Rode v. DellarcipreteCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1988
- Timothy M. Burgh v. Borough Council of the Borough of Montrose Timothy BurghCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2001
- Ruth Ann Bougher v. University of Pittsburgh, Wesley W. Posvar and Trevor Melia, in Their Official and Individual Capacities, Mary-Ann Bishop CoffeyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1989
- Ezekwo v. Nyc Health & Hospitals CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1991
- McNill v. New York City Department of CorrectionDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1996
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.