Bazemore v. Commonwealth
Court of Appeals of Virginia
1Concurring in part, dissenting in part
BENTON, J.,
with whom ELDER, J., joins, concurring, in part, and dissenting, in part.
For the reasons I have previously explained in Bazemore v. Commonwealth, 03 Vap UNP 0103021 (2003), I would affirm Nicko Bazemore’s conviction for grand larceny. Thus, I join in Parts I and Parts 11(A) of the majority opinion. I also join in Part 11(B) of the majority opinion, for the reasons I previously explained in Bazemore. I do not join in Part 11(C) *225because I would hold that the trial judge committed reversible error by omitting a significant element of the offense when he instructed the jury concerning…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- In Re WINSHIPSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Sandstrom v. MontanaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Sullivan v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- United States v. GaudinSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.