Legal Opinion

State v. . Matthews

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided June 5, 1856Published

This was an indictment, tried before his Honor, Judge Caldwell, at the Spring Term, 1856, of Cumberland Superior Court. The indictment charges that William G. Matthews, teller of the Bank of Fayetteville, did, on the 10th day of February, 1856, unlawfully pass to one William Warden, as the representative of, and as the substitute for, money, a bank bill of a less sum than three dollars, to wit, the sum of one dollar, (setting it out,) which said bill was issued by the said…

Read the full summary

This was an indictment, tried before his Honor, Judge Caldwell, at the Spring Term, 1856, of Cumberland Superior Court. The indictment charges that William G. Matthews, teller of the Bank of Fayetteville, did, on the 10th day of February, 1856, unlawfully pass to one William Warden, as the representative of, and as the substitute for, money, a bank bill of a less sum than three dollars, to wit, the sum of one dollar, (setting it out,) which said bill was issued by the said bank without being allowed by its charter to do so; against the form of the statute, &c. There were counts varying the…

1Opinion of the Court

The indictment charges that William G. Matthews, teller of the Bank of Fayetteville, did, on the 10th day of February, 1856, unlawfully pass to one William Warden, as the representative of, and as the substitute for, money, a bank bill of a less sum than three dollars, to wit, the sum of one dollar, (setting it out,) which said bill was issued by the said bank without being allowed by its charter to do so; against the form of the statute, c.

There were counts varying the charge, also one count charging that the defendant did receive, c.

The facts of passing a one dollar bank bill of the bank of…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Proctor v. MooreMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1804

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API