Legal Opinion

McPherson v. State

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided September 25, 1933No. CR 3849PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Kirby, J.,

(after stating the facts). It is uniformly held that a court of record may correct mistakes in its record which did not arise from the judicial acts of the court but from the mistakes of its recording officers. Smith v. Wallis-McKinney Coal Co., 140 Ark. 218, 215 S. W. 385. It is also thoroughly settled that it is within the court’s discretion to enter a nunc pro tunc order correcting the record at a subsequent term in criminal as well as civil cases. Richardson v. State, 169 Ark. 167, 273 S. W. 367; Goddard v. State, 78 Ark. 226, 95 S. W. 476; Bowman v. State, 93 Ark. 168, 129 S.…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Bowman v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1909
  2. Richardson v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1925
  3. Goddard v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1906
  4. Smith v. Wallis-McKinney Coal Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1919
  5. Hydrick v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1912

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Lord v. MazzanatiSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1999
  2. Harry Lee Johnson v. James Mabry, Commissioner, Arkansas Department of CorrectionCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1979
  3. State v. DawsonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2001
  4. McCuen v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1999
  5. Williams, Standridge & Deaton v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1958

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API