Legal Opinion

Cates v. Cooper Tire and Rubber Co.

District Court, N.D. Ohio

Decided May 13, 2008No. Case 3:06CV0940PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

JAMES G. CARR, Chief Judge.

This is a dispute over post-retirement health benefits. Plaintiffs Earl Cates, Bobbie Grammar and Rita Kervin allege that Cooper Tire and Rubber Co. [Cooper] — an Ohio-based tire manufacturer and retailer, breached a pension and insurance agreement [Agreement] allegedly requiring it to pay their medical benefits’ costs for life and, thereby, also breached a fiduciary duty it owed them. Cates, a former employee of Cooper, and Grammar and Kervin, spouses of former Cooper employees, allege violations of §§ 502(a)(1)(B) and 502(a)(3) of the Employee Retirement…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Carolyn Morgan v. Church's Fried ChickenCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1987
  2. Venture Associates Corporation, a Tennessee Corporation v. Zenith Data Systems Corporation, a Delaware CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1993
  3. Robert D. Sprague, Plaintiffs-Appellees/cross-Appellants v. General Motors Corporation, Defendant-Appellant/cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1998
  4. Alan Weiner, D.P.M. v. Klais and Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1997
  5. Consolidated Rail Corporation v. Railway Labor Executives' Assn.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Cates v. Cooper Tire & Rubber Co.District Court, N.D. Ohio · 2008
  2. Winnett v. Caterpillar, Inc.District Court, M.D. Tennessee · 2008

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API