State v. Wilcox
Ohio Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
[This opinion has been published in Ohio Official Reports at 179 Ohio St.3d 163.] THE STATE OF OHIO, APPELLANT, v. WILCOX, APPELLEE. [Cite as State v. Wilcox,
2024-Ohio-5719.] Criminal law—Confrontation Clause of Sixth Amendment to United States Constitution—Absent witness’s statements to law-enforcement officers captured on body-camera video that were given before defendant’s apprehension were nontestimonial because officers were responding to an ongoing emergency—Absent witness’s statements captured on body-camera video after defendant’s apprehension were testimonial, and admission of those…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Crawford v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Davis v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
- Michigan v. BryantSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
- Ohio v. ClarkSupreme Court of the United States · 2015
- State v. McKelton (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2016
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- State v. WilcoxOhio Supreme Court · 2024