Legal Opinion
Hartke v. Bonhams & Butterfields Auctioneers Corporation
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided January 23, 2024No. 1:22-cv-03571Unknown
1Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK BARBARA ANN HARTKE, an individual on her own behalf and on behalf of the Estate of decedent Gilbert V. Hartke, Plaintiff, MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER - against - 22 Civ. 3571 (PGG) BONHAMS & BUTTERFIELDS AUCTIONEERS CORPORATION and THE CATHOLIC UNIVERSITY OF AMERICA, Defendants. PAUL G. GARDEPHE, U.S.D.J.: Plaintiff Barbara Hartke — on behalf of the estate of Gilbert V. Hartke (the “Estate”) — asserts rights to a dress worn by Judy Garland in The Wizard of Oz film. (Mot. to Amend (Dkt. No. 69); Proposed Second Amended Complaint (“SAC”)…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Natalia Makarova v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2000
- Ruotolo v. City of New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2008
- Kowalski v. TesmerSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Cortlandt Street Recovery Corp. v. Hellas TelecommunicationsCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2015
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.