Legal Opinion
Close v. Kordulak Bros.
Supreme Court of New Jersey
Decided June 1, 1965PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
44 N.J. 589 (1965)
210 A.2d 753
GARNET CLOSE, PETITIONER-RESPONDENT AND CROSS-APPELLANT,
v.
KORDULAK BROS., RESPONDENT-APPELLANT AND CROSS-RESPONDENT.
CHARLES HENRY CLOSE, PETITIONER-RESPONDENT,
v.
KORDULAK BROS., RESPONDENT-APPELLANT.
The Supreme Court of New Jersey.
Argued December 14, 1964.
Decided June 1, 1965.
Mr. H. Curtis Meanor argued the cause for petitioners-respondents and cross-appellant (Messrs. Lamb, Blake, Hutchinson & Dunne, attorneys; Mr. Meanor, of counsel).
Mr. William T. McElroy argued the cause for respondent-appellant and cross-respondent (Messrs. Pindar, McElroy, Connell & Foley,…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- State v. JohnsonSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1964
- Close v. Kordulak Bros.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1965
- Dwyer v. Ford Motor Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1962
- Russo v. United States Trucking Corp.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1958
- Mulhearn v. Federal Shipbuilding and Dry Dock Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1949
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- De Angelo v. Alsan Masons, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1973
- Bd. of Ed. of Elizabeth v. City Coun. of ElizabethSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1970
- Leming v. FEDERAL PACIFIC ELECTRICAL CO.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1971