Legal Opinion · Dissent

Brusco v. Braun

New York Court of Appeals

Decided December 22, 1994Published

1DissentCiparick, J.

I respectfully dissent.

The dispositive issue on this appeal is the interpretation of the phrase "the judge shall render judgment” as used in RPAPL 732 (3). The fact that the instant petition was verified by the landlord and proper service was established does not detract from the Judge’s exercise of judgment and discretion to "render” a judgment, a distinct judicial process not subject to mandamus and wholly distinguishable from a command to perform a ministerial act, which can be the subject of a mandamus proceeding (see, Klostermann v Cuomo, 61 NY2d 525, 539). The majority, however,…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Klostermann v. CuomoNew York Court of Appeals · 1984
  2. Spring Realty Co. v. New York City Loft BoardNew York Court of Appeals · 1986
  3. Brusco v. BraunAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
  4. Evarts v. . KiehlNew York Court of Appeals · 1886

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API