Legal Opinion

Furgason v. Citizens' Street Railway Co. of Indianapolis

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided October 13, 1896No. 2,078PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Prom, the Marion Superior Court.

1Opinion of the CourtRoss, J.

The appellant sued to recover damages for personal injuries alleged to have been received while a passenger of appellee company. On a trial of the cause a special verdict was returned by the jury, upon which the court rendered judgment in favor of the appellee.

The special verdict found by the jury is as follows:

“We, the jury, return the following answers to the interrogatories and special verdict herein:

1. Did the defendant own and operate a street railway in the City of Indianapolis and its suburb, West Indianapolis, on the 29th day of November, 1894?

Ans. Yes.

2. Was not said defendant on the…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Putnam v. . B'dway Seventh Ave. R.R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1873
  2. Barney v. Oyster Bay & Huntington Steamboat Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1876
  3. Croom v. Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1893
  4. Galena & Chicago Union Railroad v. YarwoodIllinois Supreme Court · 1854
  5. Walsh v. Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1877

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Conway v. Salt Lake & O. Ry. Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1916
  2. Dahl v. Minneapolis, St. Paul & Sault Ste. Marie Railway Co.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1929
  3. Heckman v. TammenAppellate Court of Illinois · 1899

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API