State ex rel. Campbell v. Eighteen Thousand Two Hundred Thirty-Five Dollars in U.S. Currency
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
1Opinion of the CourtTaylor, J.
€ 1 The questions before this Court are (1) whether simple possession in violation of the Uniform Controlled Dangerous Substances Act (the Act), 68 0.9.2001, §§ 2-101 et seq., can give rise to title 68, subsection 2-503(A)(T)'s rebuttable presumption that monies found in close proximity to any amount of a controlled dangerous substance are themselves forfeitable, (2) whether forfeiture pursuant to subsection 2-508(A)(7) of the Act is independent of an in personam criminal charge or conviction, and (8) whether a subsection 2-508(A)(7) forfeiture is limited by the Excessive Fines Clause of the…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Austin v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- United States v. BajakajianSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- United States v. UrserySupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Browning-Ferris Industries of Vermont, Inc. v. Kelco Disposal, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
- United States v. WardSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- CITY OF OKLAHOMA CITY v. FONDRENCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2022
- In the Matter of U.S. Currency Totaling $54,226.00: Ronald S. Mickulin v. The State of WyomingWyoming Supreme Court · 2025
- State Ex Rel. Ladd v. $457.02Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2011
- CITY OF OKLAHOMA CITY v. FONDRENCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2022
- State Ex Rel. Campbell v. $18,235.00Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2008
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.