Legal Opinion

Application of Charles J. Hirsch

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided January 12, 1962No. Patent Appeal 6695PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RICH, Judge.

This appeal from the affirmance of the rejection of application Ser. No. 446,301, filed July 28, 1954, for “Color Image-Reproducing Apparatus,” raises a single question as to the sufficiency of disclosure under 35 U.S.C. § 112.

The drawing of the application is a single sheet showing a color TV receiver in the form of a block diagram consisting, except for symbols representing the antenna, three diodes, and three resistors, of 18 “blocks” or rectangles lettered to indicate various circuits making up the receiver. The connections between these blocks are shown and their connections…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Application of John A. Nelson and Anthony C. ShabicaCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1960
  2. Application of BeachCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1946

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Flick-Reedy Corporation v. Hydro-Line Manufacturing Company, Flick-Reedy Corporation v. Hydro-Line Manufacturing CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1965
  2. Dow Chemical Co. v. Halliburton Co.District Court, N.D. Mississippi · 1985
  3. Application of Charles J. HirschCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1962
  4. Danilo Santini and George MacRedis v. Raymond A. Burgy, Walter A. Nikazy and Ernest B. ThurstonCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1963
  5. Levy v. LaddDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1964

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API