Legal Opinion

Kinsland v. . Kinsland

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided December 20, 1923PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHoice, J.

In sections 2555, 2556, 2557, and 2558, Consolidated Statutes, provision is made for obtaining relief where one conceives himself damaged by the erection of a grist-mill or mill for other useful purpose, and ordinarily, in cases to which the statute applies, the remedy given must be pursued. The history of this legislation and the reason for it, together with an interpretation of its meaning and purpose, appears in Hester v. Broach, 84 N. C., 253, and other cases on the subject.

"While there are allegations in plaintiff’s affidavit which tend to show wrongful trespasses committed on…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Hester v. . BroachSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1881

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State v. . KincaidSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1922
  2. Kinsland v. . KinslandSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1924
  3. Kinsland v. . KinslandSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1926

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API