Legal Opinion

Powell v. Whitaker

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided February 17, 1879PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Error to the Court of Common Pleas, No. 3, of Philadelphia county: Of January Term 1878, No. 271. This was an amicable action of assumpsit wherein Robert Hare Powell and John C. Bradley, trading as Robert Hare Powell & Co., assignees of Thomas Gr. Cooke, were plaintiffs, and Robert Whitaker in his own behalf,' and Robert Whitaker, administrator of the estate of Edward C. Cooke, deceased, were defendants.

Read the full summary

Error to the Court of Common Pleas, No. 3, of Philadelphia county: Of January Term 1878, No. 271. This was an amicable action of assumpsit wherein Robert Hare Powell and John C. Bradley, trading as Robert Hare Powell & Co., assignees of Thomas Gr. Cooke, were plaintiffs, and Robert Whitaker in his own behalf,' and Robert Whitaker, administrator of the estate of Edward C. Cooke, deceased, were defendants. A case was stated for the opinion of the court in substance as follows: On the 20th of November 1874, Thomas Gr. Cooke was seised in fee-simple, and in possession of a lot of ground situate…

1Opinion of the Court

The judgment of the Supreme Court was entered, February 17th 1879,

2Per curiam

We affirm this judgment on the opinion of President Judge Ludlow in the court below.

Judgment affirmed.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Knoll v. N. Y. etc. Ry. Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1888
  2. Fidelity-Philadelphia Trust Co. v. KrausSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1937
  3. Woods Run AvenueSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1910
  4. DeWitt v. Lehigh Valley RailroadSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1902
  5. Irons v. PittsburghSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1916

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API