Legal Opinion

Wolf v. Stix

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided January 18, 1878PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Motion to dismiss a writ of error to the Supreme Court of the State of Tennessee.

1Opinion of the Court

Me. Chief- Justice Waite

delivéréd the opinion of the court.

This was a bill in chancery, filed by Louis Stix &' Co. in; the Chancery Court of Shelby County, Tennessee, in accordance' with the laws and practice of that State, against Marks, Pump, & Co. and M. Wolf, >bo recover a debt due them from Marks, Pump, & Co., and to set aside a sale of goods by the latter firm to Wolf, because, as alleged, it was made to defraud creditors. A writ of attachment was sued out upon this bill, and the goods were attached in the possession of Wolf.

By the Code of.Tennessee (sect. 3509), the' defendants to an…

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. Wolf v. StixSupreme Court of the United States · 1879
  2. Howell v. PateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1904
  3. Kirtland v. Mississippi & Tennessee RailroadTennessee Supreme Court · 1880

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API