Legal Opinion

Roganti v. Metropolitan Life Insurance

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided May 14, 2015No. Nos. 13-4532-cv (L), 13-4684-cv (XAP)PublishedCited by 41 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DEBRA ANN LIVINGSTON, Circuit Judge:

Plaintiff-appellee-cross-appellant Ronald Roganti (“Roganti”) was a successful executive with defendant-appellant-cross-appellee Metropolitan Life Insurance Company (“MetLife”1) until 2005, when he resigned in the face of pay reductions that he claims were levied in retaliation for his opposition to unethical business practices. Roganti *204brought arbitration proceedings against MetLife before the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (“FINRA”), seeking, among other things, wages that he would have been paid but for the retaliatory pay reductions, as well as…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. BruchSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  2. Metropolitan Life Insurance v. GlennSupreme Court of the United States · 2008
  3. Black & Decker Disability Plan v. NordSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
  4. Ruckelshaus v. Sierra ClubSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  5. Hardt v. Reliance Standard Life Insurance Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 2010

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by41 opinions

  1. Picard v. MaglianoCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2022
  2. C. v. United Healthcare Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2023
  3. Metro-North Commuter R.R. Co. v. U.S. Dep't of LaborCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2018
  4. Salisbury v. Prudential Insurance Co. of AmericaDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2017
  5. Soto v. Disney Severance Pay PlanCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2022

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API