Legal Opinion

Gunn v. Fontes

California Court of Appeal

Decided February 8, 1957No. Civ. No. 17115PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

WOOD (Fred B.), J.

Upon defendants’ appeal from a judgment declaring that a certain road across defendant Fred Fontes’ land is a public road and is 14 feet wide, defendants claim the evidence is insufficient to show (1) an offer to dedicate to a public use, (2) acceptance by the public of the offer, or (3) that the road is 14 feet wide.

The offer appeared upon a subdivision map entitled “Map of Van Hoosear Tract” which depicted several parcels of land and across some of them certain roads, including the road in suit, indicated by parallel broken lines and the designation “common road” (except…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Union Transportation Co. v. Sacramento CountyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1954
  2. Harding & Loftin v. JasperCalifornia Supreme Court · 1860
  3. Schwerdtle v. County of PlacerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
  4. Niles v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
  5. Garrison v. Edward Brown & SonsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Hanshaw v. Long Valley Road Ass'nCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2004

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API