Legal Opinion
Ulrich v. United States Department of Treasury
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided April 27, 2005No. Nos. 03-73491, 03-73591, 03-73854, 03-73997; TREA No. AA-EC-00-40PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM *
Eugene Ulrich and Susan Diehl McCarthy (collectively, “Ulrich”) petition for review of the Comptroller of the Currency’s (Comptroller) orders directing them to pay restitution and civil money penalties, and the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System’s (Board) orders prohibiting them from further participation in the affairs of any financial institution. We deny the petitions.
I
The administrative law judge (ALJ) neither abused her discretion nor denied due process in taking official notice of Six River National Bank’s (the Bank) status as an insured depository institution.…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Perry v. LeekeSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Teresa De Jesus Castillo-Villagra v. Immigration and Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
- Samson Eshete Getachew v. Immigration & Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994
- Golden Grain MacAroni Company, a Corporation v. Federal Trade CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1972
- Jacob F. Bosma D/B/A Chino Livestock Commission Company and Yardage v. United States Department of AgricultureCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Harry Calcutt III v. FDICCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2022
- Harry Calcutt III v. FDICCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2022