Hunt v. Richmond & Danville Railroad
Supreme Court of North Carolina
This was a Civil action, tried before Mevrimon, J., at Fall Term, 1890, of Henderson Superior Court. At the close of plaintiff’s evidence, the Court intimated an opinion that the plaintiff could not recover. Whereupon, he took a nonsuit, and appealed.
1Opinion of the Court
Clark, J.:
Rule 28 (104 N. C., 924) provides: “Fifteen copies of so much and such parts of the record as may be necessary to a proper understanding of the exceptions and grounds of error assigned as appear in the record in each civil action shall be printed.” And Rule 29 provides that “ such printed matter shall consist of the statement of the case on appeal and of the exceptions appearing in the record to be reviewed by the Court, or, in case of a demurrer, of such demurrer and the pleadings to which it is entered.” Rule 30 provides that, if these rules are not complied with by the time the…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Horton v. . GreenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1889
- Witt v. . LongSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1885
3Cited by6 opinions
- Edwards v. Town of HendersonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1891
- Wiley v. Bessemer City Mining Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1895
- Fleming v. . McPhailSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1897
- Carter v. LongSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1895
- Carter v. . LongSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1895
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.