Abs Servs., Inc. v. James Constr. Grp.
Louisiana Court of Appeal
1Concurring in part, dissenting in partWhipple, C.J.
*740I respectfully concur in part and dissent in part from the per curiam opinion. I concur in the per curiam opinion insofar as the majority concludes that as to all issues before us for which there is no executable majority, the judgment stands. I likewise concur in the denial of JCG and Continental's peremptory exception of no cause of action and DOTD's peremptory exception of peremption . I further concur in the per curiam opinion's conclusions that there was no manifest error in the jury's finding that JCG breached the subcontract and ABS did not and in the conclusion that JCG and…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited42 opinions
- Stobart v. State Through DOTDSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1993
- Jordan v. Travelers Insurance CompanySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1971
- Hoefly v. Government Employees Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1982
- Bellard v. American Cent. Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 2008
- State v. McInnis Bros. Const.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1997
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.