Legal Opinion

Leach v. Haight

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided July 1, 1898PublishedCited by 2 opinions

.Appeal by the defendants, Friend C. Haight and another, from, an order of the Supreme Court, made at the Hew York Special Term and entered in the office of the clerk of the county of Hew York on the 6th- day of October, 1898, denying the defendants’ motion to vacate an order for their examination before trial.

1Opinion of the Court

Patterson, J. :

An order for the examination of the defendants before trial and requiring them to produce books and papers for inspection having been granted and served, the defendants moved to vacate it. That, motion was denied, so far as the examination of the defendants as. witnesses is concerned, but the requirement that books and papers, be produced was stricken out. The defendants now appeal from the order denying the motion to vacate.

The question is, whether the plaintiff is entitled to the examination directed. She sued to recover back moneys deposited with the-defendants as margins…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Jiminez v. WardAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1897
  2. Prout v. ChisolmAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1897

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Wagner v. Haight & Freese Co.New York Supreme Court · 1903
  2. Bagley v. WinslowNew York Supreme Court · 1901

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API