Clarence Brown v. Brad D. Schimel
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
Clarence E. Brown appeals the district court’s denial of relief under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (habeas corpus) on his claim that Wisconsin’s prohibition against carrying a concealed weapon, Wis. Stat. § 941.23 (effective 2007-2011), is unconstitutional under the Second Amendment as applied to him. Because the district court did not err in finding that Brown’s as-applied claim was procedurally defaulted, we AFFIRM.
I. Background
Police officers encountered Brown on October 2009 while responding to a complaint that shots had been fired in the neighborhood of 25th and West Locust Street in Milwaukee,…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- District of Columbia v. HellerSupreme Court of the United States · 2008
- Citizens United v. Federal Election CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 2010
- State v. ColeWisconsin Supreme Court · 2003
- Smith v. McKeeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2010
- State v. HamdanWisconsin Supreme Court · 2003
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.