Legal Opinion

Lannamann v. Lannamann

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided July 17, 1952No. Appeal, 72PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Arnold, J.,

The wife-plaintiff filed a complaint asking for the annulment of her marriage. The sole ground stated was “that said marriage ceremony [occurring December 30, 1950] was gone through in jest, that neither party thereto intended to contract a valid, marriage, and that said parties undertook that no legal obligation should be thereby created.” The defendant offered no testimony but filed an answer denying that the ceremony “was gone through in jest.” He averred that the marriage itself was not to be consummated until February, 1951, and that it was never his intention to…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Dash v. DashSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1947
  2. Barnett v. KimmellSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1859
  3. Cantor v. CantorSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1918

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. MBoard of Immigration Appeals · 1958
  2. Faivre v. FaivreSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1956
  3. Jewett v. JewettSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1961
  4. Patounas v. Patounas, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Lancaster County1960
  5. Barnes v. Barnes, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Columbia County1961

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API