Legal Opinion · Concurrence

In Re State Sales Tax Liability of Simpson

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided May 19, 1993No. 18015, 18026Published

1ConcurrenceHenderson, Justice

As the majority writing notes, the Department of Revenue assessed Simpson for delinquent sales taxes, penalties, and interest for perpetrating fraud on the State of South Dakota. Simpson collected sales tax without a license, as depicted below. Furthermore, he never remitted all of these collected revenues to the State.

There is a key difference from my special concurrence in Matter of Discipline of Simpson, 467 N.W.2d 921, 923 (S.D.1991), as I shall mention. At the time of that writing, collecting and not remitting sales tax, had not been established. It has now been established in subsequent…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Tri-State Refining & Investment Co. v. Apaloosa Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1988
  2. Matter of Discipline of SimpsonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1991
  3. Loel Lust Chevrolet Co. v. Commissioner of RevenueSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1968

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API