Legal Opinion

Fulkerson v. Great Lakes Pipe Line Co.

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided October 13, 1934PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

* NOTE: Opinion filed at May Term, 1934, May 17, 1934; motion to modify opinion filed; motion overruled at September Term, October 13, 1934. Action for damages claimed by plaintiffs because of the laying of a pipe line across their farm by defendant. Plaintiffs obtained a judgment for $600 from which defendant appealed to the Kansas City Court of Appeals which, by a divided opinion, reversed the judgment and remanded the cause. [Fulkerson v. Great Lakes Pipe Line Co., 60 S.W.2d 71.] Upon the request of the dissenting judge, who deemed the majority opinion in conflict with certain decisions of…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. City of St. Louis v. LaughlinSupreme Court of Missouri · 1872
  2. Donovan v. BoeckSupreme Court of Missouri · 1909
  3. Prairie Pipe Line Co. v. ShippSupreme Court of Missouri · 1924
  4. Swift & Co. v. Columbia Ry., Gas & Electric Co.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1927
  5. McSherry v. HeimerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1916

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Herbert & Brooner Construction Co. v. GoldenMissouri Court of Appeals · 1973
  2. Shamblen v. Great Lakes Pipe Line Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1954
  3. Frankfort Oil Company v. AbramsSupreme Court of Colorado · 1966
  4. Flying Diamond Corp. v. RustUtah Supreme Court · 1976
  5. William J. Kleinheider v. Phillips Pipe Line Company, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1976

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API